U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Final Rule Setting Forth Test For Classifying Workers As Independent Contractors Based Upon "Economic Realities"

Porzio Client Alert

On January 6, 2021, the United States Department of Labor released a Final Rule setting forth the factors to be considered in applying the "Economic Realities Test" to determine whether a worker properly can be classified as an independent contractor and thereby can be exempt from the minimum wage, overtime, and recordkeeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203, et seq. (FLSA).

The Department has articulated that the "ultimate inquiry" in applying this test is whether the worker is dependent on the entity in question for work, and therefore is an employee, or is in business for him- or herself, and therefore is an independent contractor. The factors to be considered in making such a determination are identified as "Core Factors" and "Other Factors." 

The Core Factors are given more weight in the analysis and include (i) the nature and degree of control that the potential employer exercises over the work, and (ii) whether the worker has the opportunity to earn profits or incur losses.

An analysis of the nature and degree of the worker's control over the work requires consideration of  whether the worker exercises "substantial control" over the "key aspects of the performance of the work," such as setting the worker's own schedule, or whether the worker is permitted to work for others, possibly including the potential employer's competitors. The Department expressly excludes from this analysis any mandates that a worker comply with legal obligations or health and safety standards, carry insurance, meet contractual deadlines or quality control obligations, or adhere to similar requirements typically included in independent contractor agreements. The ability to  earn profits or incur losses would suggest that the worker is an independent contractor; a worker's inability to affect his or her own earnings outside of meeting or exceeding the benchmarks of the potential employer's compensation scheme favors an employee/employer relationship.

The three Other Factors identified by the Department include (i) the amount of skill required to complete the work; (ii) the degree of performance (which generally means whether the relationship is ongoing or for a limited purpose or period); (iii) and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production.  Circumstances suggestive of an independent contractor relationship include work that requires specialized training or skill that the employer does not provide, limited as opposed to indefinite engagements, and work that is segregable from, as opposed to integrated with, the potential employer's production process. The Department has cautioned that the last factor is distinct from the question of  the centrality or importance of the work to the potential employer's business.

Consideration of other factors relating to economic realities is permitted, provided the additional factors address the actual practices taking place in the relationship between the worker and potential employer, as opposed to theoretical possibilities or abstract formalities of the relationship.  For example, a contractual term that is not enforced cannot support a finding that a worker is an independent contractor.

Notably, the contours of the Final Rule suggest that under the federal regulation, a potential employer’s decision to offer benefits to an independent contractor would not be a dispositive factor in determining whether an employment relationship exists.  Potential employers who wish to offer benefits to independent contractors should consult with legal counsel to evaluate the implications of modifying their existing agreements.    

Notwithstanding the foregoing, many states' laws, including New Jersey's, establish different, and in some cases, more restrictive tests to evaluate whether a worker can be classified as an independent contractor.  Potential employers intending an independent contractor relationship should consider both federal and state laws, and should be aware that state laws may require further action to ensure that their independent contractor classifications can be upheld if challenged.   

Informative examples to guide application of the Final Rule are set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 795.115.

The Final Rule will be published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2021, and will be set forth at 29 C.F.R. §§ 780, 788, and 795. Please contact a Porzio attorney for additional guidance on this topic.

Share with:

Related Practices

Related Areas of Focus